The 5 Pillars of Our Research Methodology

We utilize a weighted scoring system to inform our structural reviews. It is important to note that physical precious metals do not produce yield, dividends, or interest. A firm is evaluated against defined thresholds across all five pillars as part of our institutional review process. These standards are designed to support independent due diligence — Download the Research Checklist.

1. Structural Fees 25%

We evaluate the 15-year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), with a focus on flat-fee custodial models for portfolio efficiency.

  • Review of setup costs vs. recurring annual maintenance.
  • Assessment of dealer spreads (Bullion vs. Proofs).
  • Screening for unstated liquidation penalties.
2. Custodial Structure 20%

Institutional evaluations typically consider partnerships with US trust companies maintaining a clean regulatory record and significant AUM.

  • Evaluation of Equity Trust, STRATA, or GoldStar relationships.
  • Structural separation of Dealer vs. Custodian entities.
  • IRC Section 408(m) purity compliance review.
3. Liquidity Framework 25%

Liquidity is one of several key risk factors evaluated. We evaluate historical data to determine standard fulfillment and payout processes. (See providers evaluated for liquidity characteristics).

  • Review of documented buyback frameworks.
  • Evaluation of historical liquidation timelines.
  • Fee-minimized liquidation structures for high-net-worth accounts.
4. Institutional Logistics 15%

Metals are typically held in specialized US depository facilities in order to meet IRS requirements, with documented biometric security and institutional insurance limits.

  • Review of Delaware Depository, Brink’s, or IDS partners.
  • Verification of reported institutional insurance coverage levels (often $1B+).
  • Analysis of Segregated vs. Commingled storage availability.
5. Ethics & Sentiment 15%

Our team reviews feedback data for observable resolution patterns and evaluates potential sales pressure tactics.

  • Minimum 10-year operational history for top-tier review.
  • Analysis of complaint resolution vs. transaction volume.
  • Educational focus vs. urgency-based sales methodologies.

Research Results: Providers That Met Evaluation Thresholds

Based on our 2026 evaluation dataset, a limited number of providers met the defined evaluation thresholds of our 5-Point Institutional Framework.

View The 2026 Shortlist »

Referral Disclosure: Maitland Wealth may receive a commission if you open an account through this research link. This structural support allows us to maintain our independent, non-advisory research operations.

Scroll to Top